Judge Boasberg, a federal judge in Washington D.C., has recently come under fire for his selective advocacy for due process. This has raised critical questions about the integrity of our judicial system and the stark contrast in his treatment of illegal immigrants and Trump supporters.
In recent months, Judge Boasberg has been vocal about the due process rights of illegal immigrants and alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang. He has expressed concern over their treatment and has urged the government to provide them with fair and just proceedings. However, this same level of concern and advocacy was nowhere to be found when it came to the due process rights of J6ers and Trump supporters.
The double standards displayed by Judge Boasberg and other DC judges are alarming. While they cry out for the rights of illegal immigrants and alleged gang members, they turn a blind eye to the blatant violations of due process that occurred during the January 6th Capitol riot and its aftermath.
Let’s take a closer look at the glaring differences in the treatment of these two groups. Illegal immigrants and alleged gang members are given the benefit of the doubt, with the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. They are provided with legal representation and have their day in court. On the other hand, J6ers and Trump supporters have been subjected to harsh treatment, with many being held in solitary confinement for months without being charged or given a fair trial.
It is evident that the views and political affiliations of these two groups have influenced the treatment they have received. While illegal immigrants and alleged gang members are seen as victims, J6ers and Trump supporters are portrayed as criminals and domestic terrorists. This biased treatment goes against the very principles of due process and equality under the law.
Furthermore, the lack of concern for the due process rights of J6ers and Trump supporters raises questions about the integrity of our judicial system. How can we trust that justice will be served when judges are not impartial and fair? The selective advocacy for due process by Judge Boasberg and other DC judges undermines the credibility of the entire judicial system.
The blatant disregard for due process rights also sets a dangerous precedent. If the rights of one group can be brushed aside, then it opens the door for the rights of others to also be violated in the future. This erodes the very foundation of our democracy and the rule of law.
It is time for Judge Boasberg and other DC judges to uphold their oath to the Constitution and ensure that due process is equally applied to all individuals, regardless of their political beliefs or background. The American people deserve a justice system that is fair and just, and it is the duty of judges to protect the rights of all individuals, not just those who align with their personal views.
In conclusion, the selective advocacy for due process by Judge Boasberg and other DC judges is a cause for concern. The stark contrast in their treatment of illegal immigrants and Trump supporters is a clear indication of bias and undermines the integrity of our judicial system. It is time for judges to put aside their personal beliefs and uphold the principles of fairness and equality under the law. Only then can we truly have a just and democratic society.